

This transformation can do more than merely go back or forward in history.

With this magic word, the files in your directory suddenly shapeshift from one version to another. Solution: Git has a better tool for these situations that is much faster and more space-efficient than cloning: git branch. Even though Git reduces the cost of this with file sharing and hard links, the project files themselves must be recreated in their entirety in the new working directory. Distributed systems fare better, as we can clone the desired version locally.īut cloning still entails copying the whole working directory as well as the entire history up to the given point.
#Create branch from master git download#
With centralized version control we must download a fresh working copy from the central server.

Interrupting your train of thought can be detrimental to your productivity, and the more cumbersome it is to switch contexts, the greater the loss. In all cases, you must abruptly drop what you are doing and focus on a completely different task. A developer whose help you need for a key section of the project is about to leave. The deadline for aĬertain feature is moved closer. A severeīug manifests in the released version without warning. Problem: External factors inevitably necessitate context switching. Instant branching and merging are the most lethal of Git’s killer features.
